![]() |
|
||||
|
It was a home game for UK. And UL plays up to the level of their competition.. it's been happening all season.. competing with bad teams badly, playing good teams well... see: @ UK, @Cincy, and @ UConn
and, SU, MTSU, Utah, Murray State.
__________________
![]() |
|
||||
|
Uhm, wasn't UK at home today? I'll give you that they were very beat up after playing LSU and Florida in back-to-back games, but they didn't get blown out down in Mississippi. I'm also not buying a 5-4 MS State team as a tough test when they get their second conference win at the hands of UK.
None of this is to say that we are now better than them. We stink, too.
__________________
Last edited by Empire Lindy; 10-27-2007 at 10:15 PM. |
|
||||
|
The media picked UK to finish 5th in the SEC East. In spite of UK having a season for the ages, I looked in the paper today to find the SEC standings. And sure enough, there is Kentucky...5th in the SEC East. As bad as they looked yesterday, I don't foresee them beating Georgia or Tennessee and even Vandy would be a coin toss. Looks like the potential for another 5th place finish.
__________________
Look, I've got certain information, certain things have come to light, and uh, has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new shit, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh--you know? |
|
||||
|
I remember the one dude..i guess from sporting news i forget..has UL and Pitt ranked in the 70's. They sure played like it.
Anyways, they surprisingly upset LSU, but i told you they'd lose one to Vandy or MissST. Yet they are still much better than UL is right now. This of course isn't saying much. Fire Krag please..
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|