![]() |
|
||||
|
i honestly don't know what the deal is with the defense. but, from where i was sitting, the intensity increased noticeably in the 2nd half. the hits were harder. far fewer tackles were missed. once someone was in the grasp, that someone went down. usually under a pile. i'm really hoping that what we've seen is a poorly focused, mentally unprepared team that will turn it up a few notches once the competition improves. having never played football, i don't know how possible it is to turn that kind of focus on and off depending on who you are playing.
good job, el, pointing out the penalty thing. a lot people, including myself, have been worried that louisville is returning to the bad old days of cooper or smith and the lack of discipline. but, this is definitely not a kragthorpe thing. last year the cards were penalized 66 times for 582 yards. tulsa 66 times for 572 yards. it really doesn't make sense what's happened so far. |
|
||||
|
For the penalties, there is no excuse. Those were just plain stupid.
As for everything else. We have to remember we did lose Amobi Okoye and Nate Harris to graduation and this is the first year of the Kragthorpe era. We have to give this some time and see where it goes (after all Cooper DID get three years). Kragthorpe comes in with a much better resume than Petrino did. There are always some type of an adjustment period for the players to get used to the new coaches. I think you have to give Krag some kudos for at least TRYING to make the adjustment as smooth as possible. Im just saying give it some time and you'll see a rapid improvement and I think the team will be even better than last year. Oh and one more thing: IN TOM WE TRUST!!! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
On the defensive side, Cassity continues to lead the schemes. EL might have a point about losing the other assistants on defense, but the scheme is the same, but that doesn't explain what I say and what Curry kept repeating throughout the game...that the defense wasn't running to the ball. With all the speed we are supposed to have on defense, a running back should not be able to outrun those DBs. The defensive line should have been all over that inexperienced O-line of MTSU, but managed a mere sack on a QB who was in the process of running rather than passing. The penalties are simply stupid and come from a lack of individual discipline. Urrutia was flagged twice last week and dropped balls. That comes from a lack of concentration. Urrutia jumping in to defend Douglas IMO was inexcusable. He took the team from a 3rd and goal at the one to a 3rd and goal at the 16. That is simple immaturity. I still love this team, but there is no way they can compete against the likes of USF, UC and WVU on the road with such an impotent defense.
__________________
Look, I've got certain information, certain things have come to light, and uh, has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new shit, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh--you know? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Basically what would happen is the defensive front would split out wide on either side, allowing two linebackers to come to the line and create a 6-man front. I don't know if this was intended to confuse MTSU's quarterback or create additional pressure, but the result darn near every time was a quick pass across the middle for a big gain (where the LB's had vacated) or a run between the tackle and guard where the D-linemen were too wide to stop and the LB's too far into the backfield to pursue properly. I saw this "Cover 0" no less than 8 times against Middle Tennessee. Maybe I wasn't paying as close of attention last year, but that formation and defensive attack just seemed completely new and ineffective.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|